CRM-M-21668 236 BALDEV ALIAS KARAN STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. 55 1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail. 2. As per paragraph 9 of the bail application, the a antecedents. 3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows: “That it is submitted that FIR No.55 dated 30.03.2025 U/ss 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of against Karan and unknown person on the statement of complainant Rohit Kumar that he is doing job in Vardhman Factory, Hoshiarpur. On 28.03.2025, after finishing his night duty he was going to his house on 8487. At about 08:30 p.m. when the complainant reached Jhidi area ahead of Sai Baba Temple, Karan resident of Kokila Bihar alongwith10/12 unknown persons was standing in the way and he intercepted the complai Then the above said Karan gave blow of sharp edged weapon upon the complainant while the complainant was sitting on the motor cycle and the complainant raised his left arm in order to save himself and the said blo hit on the left arm of the complainant. After that one unknown person out of them hit heavy thing on behind the head of the complainant and thereafter, one unknown person out of them hit baseball bat on his right leg on the ground. Thereafter they all inflicted internal injuries to the complainant. Somehow the complainant managed to escape by running from there. On this, they all 21668-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BALDEV ALIAS KARAN Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, D.A.G., Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. Dated Police Station 30.03.2025 Sadar Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail. As per paragraph 9 of the bail application, the a The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows: That it is submitted that FIR No.55 dated 30.03.2025 U/ss 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of BNS 2023 was registered at P.S. Sadar, Hoshiarpur against Karan and unknown person on the statement of complainant Rohit Kumar that he is doing job in Vardhman Factory, Hoshiarpur. On 28.03.2025, after finishing his night duty he was going to his house on his motor cycle marka Pulsar bearing No.PB 8487. At about 08:30 p.m. when the complainant reached Jhidi area ahead of Sai Baba Temple, Karan resident of Kokila Bihar alongwith10/12 unknown persons was standing in the way and he intercepted the complainant and started to abuse the complainant. Then the above said Karan gave blow of sharp edged weapon upon the complainant while the complainant was sitting on the motor cycle and the complainant raised his left arm in order to save himself and the said blow of sharp edged weapon given by Karan hit on the left arm of the complainant. After that one unknown person out of them hit heavy thing on behind the head of the complainant and thereafter, one unknown person out of them hit baseball bat on his right leg on the ground. Thereafter they all inflicted internal injuries to the complainant. Somehow the complainant managed to escape by running from there. On this, they all IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21668-2025 Date of decision:03.07.2025 ...Petitioner …Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, D.A.G., Punjab. Sections Sadar Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 324(4), 191(3), 190 BNS The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], As per paragraph 9 of the bail application, the accused has no criminal The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, That it is submitted that FIR No.55 dated 30.03.2025 U/ss 115(2), 118(1), BNS 2023 was registered at P.S. Sadar, Hoshiarpur against Karan and unknown person on the statement of complainant Rohit Kumar that he is doing job in Vardhman Factory, Hoshiarpur. On 28.03.2025, after finishing his night his motor cycle marka Pulsar bearing No.PB-07-V- 8487. At about 08:30 p.m. when the complainant reached Jhidi area ahead of Sai Baba Temple, Karan resident of Kokila Bihar alongwith10/12 unknown persons was standing nant and started to abuse the complainant. Then the above said Karan gave blow of sharp edged weapon upon the complainant while the complainant was sitting on the motor cycle and the complainant raised his left w of sharp edged weapon given by Karan hit on the left arm of the complainant. After that one unknown person out of them hit heavy thing on behind the head of the complainant and thereafter, one unknown person out of them hit baseball bat on his right leg resulting which the complainant fell on the ground. Thereafter they all inflicted internal injuries to the complainant. Somehow the complainant managed to escape by running from there. On this, they all The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], ccused has no criminal The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, That it is submitted that FIR No.55 dated 30.03.2025 U/ss 115(2), 118(1), BNS 2023 was registered at P.S. Sadar, Hoshiarpur against Karan and unknown person on the statement of complainant Rohit Kumar that he is doing job in Vardhman Factory, Hoshiarpur. On 28.03.2025, after finishing his night - 8487. At about 08:30 p.m. when the complainant reached Jhidi area ahead of Sai Baba Temple, Karan resident of Kokila Bihar alongwith10/12 unknown persons was standing nant and started to abuse the complainant. Then the above said Karan gave blow of sharp edged weapon upon the complainant while the complainant was sitting on the motor cycle and the complainant raised his left w of sharp edged weapon given by Karan hit on the left arm of the complainant. After that one unknown person out of them hit heavy thing on behind the head of the complainant and thereafter, one unknown resulting which the complainant fell on the ground. Thereafter they all inflicted internal injuries to the complainant. Somehow the complainant managed to escape by running from there. On this, they all Jyoti 2025.07.10 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21668 began to chase the complainant. When the complainant started to break the motor cycle of the complainant. Somehow, the complainant reached his house. Kuljit Singh son of Sardar Tarlok Singh, resident of Bassi Gulam Hussain arranged a vehicle and got him admitted in Civil Hospita reason behind the occurrence is that on 18.02.2025, there was a marriage of a son of the Bua of the complainant where Karan alongwith two other young boys came and they caused disturbance in the marriage after taking liquor and as such t side sent them from the house of his Bua. On this account, both parties reached the police station and SHO of the police station got effected compromise between them. Due to this grudge, accused inflicted injuries to the complainant. Till to compromise was in progress between them but it could not succeed. Hence, prayer for legal action against the accused. 4. Counsel for the petitioner stringent conditions this Court might put up arms, if any. He undertakes like a decent human being and mend his ways. He further submits that in case petitioner is found involved in any offence w he shall have no objection if the State files an application for cancellation of bail in the present FIR. He pre-trial incarceration family. 5. The State’s counsel opposes bail and refers to the status report. 6. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the status report, which read as follows: “ROLE OF PE That it is submitted that the present FIR was registered against the petitioner by name. There are grave, serious and specific allegations against the petitioner that the petitioner and his associates intercepted the complainant on the way when th complainant was going to his house on his motor cycle and inflicted injuries upon the person of complainant. Somehow complainant managed to escape from the spot by running and reached his house. Complainant was admitted in Civil Hospital Hoshiarpur. As p complainant, out of which injury was caused with sharp weapon and remaining injuries were caused with blunt weapon. Injury No.2 and 3 was declared in simple in nature. No.1 was kept pending for final opini report of NCCT LFET forearm from GMC, Amritsar. The petitioner has not cooperated in the investigation, has not disclosed the names of unnown person and has not got effected recovery of used weapon in the commission of offenc The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required for proper 21668-2025 2 began to chase the complainant. When the complainant started to break the motor cycle of the complainant. Somehow, the complainant reached his house. Kuljit Singh son of Sardar Tarlok Singh, resident of Bassi Gulam Hussain arranged a vehicle and got him admitted in Civil Hospita reason behind the occurrence is that on 18.02.2025, there was a marriage of a son of the Bua of the complainant where Karan alongwith two other young boys came and they caused disturbance in the marriage after taking liquor and as such t side sent them from the house of his Bua. On this account, both parties reached the police station and SHO of the police station got effected compromise between them. Due to this grudge, accused inflicted injuries to the complainant. Till to compromise was in progress between them but it could not succeed. Hence, prayer for legal action against the accused. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would have no objection in case any stringent conditions this Court might put upon the petitioner including surrender of fire . He undertakes that without admitting or conceding, petitioner would live like a decent human being and mend his ways. He further submits that in case petitioner is found involved in any offence where the sentence prescribed is more than 07 years, he shall have no objection if the State files an application for cancellation of bail in the He prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their The State’s counsel opposes bail and refers to the status report. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the status report, which read as follows: “ROLE OF PETITIONER That it is submitted that the present FIR was registered against the petitioner by name. There are grave, serious and specific allegations against the petitioner that the petitioner and his associates intercepted the complainant on the way when th complainant was going to his house on his motor cycle and inflicted injuries upon the person of complainant. Somehow complainant managed to escape from the spot by running and reached his house. Complainant was admitted in Civil Hospital Hoshiarpur. As per MLR there are three injuries upon the person of complainant, out of which injury was caused with sharp weapon and remaining injuries were caused with blunt weapon. Injury No.2 and 3 was declared in simple in nature. No.1 was kept pending for final opini report of NCCT LFET forearm from GMC, Amritsar. The petitioner has not cooperated in the investigation, has not disclosed the names of unnown person and has not got effected recovery of used weapon in the commission of offenc The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required for proper began to chase the complainant. When the complainant went far away from them, they started to break the motor cycle of the complainant. Somehow, the complainant reached his house. Kuljit Singh son of Sardar Tarlok Singh, resident of Bassi Gulam Hussain arranged a vehicle and got him admitted in Civil Hospital, Hoshiarpur. The reason behind the occurrence is that on 18.02.2025, there was a marriage of a son of the Bua of the complainant where Karan alongwith two other young boys came and they caused disturbance in the marriage after taking liquor and as such the complainant side sent them from the house of his Bua. On this account, both parties reached the police station and SHO of the police station got effected compromise between them. Due to this grudge, accused inflicted injuries to the complainant. Till today, a talk of compromise was in progress between them but it could not succeed. Hence, prayer for submits that he would have no objection in case any on the petitioner including surrender of fire without admitting or conceding, petitioner would live like a decent human being and mend his ways. He further submits that in case petitioner here the sentence prescribed is more than 07 years, he shall have no objection if the State files an application for cancellation of bail in the prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their The State’s counsel opposes bail and refers to the status report. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the status report, That it is submitted that the present FIR was registered against the petitioner by name. There are grave, serious and specific allegations against the petitioner that the petitioner and his associates intercepted the complainant on the way when the complainant was going to his house on his motor cycle and inflicted injuries upon the person of complainant. Somehow complainant managed to escape from the spot by running and reached his house. Complainant was admitted in Civil er MLR there are three injuries upon the person of complainant, out of which injury was caused with sharp weapon and remaining injuries were caused with blunt weapon. Injury No.2 and 3 was declared in simple in nature. No.1 was kept pending for final opinion by the doctor for receiving report of NCCT LFET forearm from GMC, Amritsar. The petitioner has not cooperated in the investigation, has not disclosed the names of unnown person and has not got effected recovery of used weapon in the commission of offence. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required for proper went far away from them, they started to break the motor cycle of the complainant. Somehow, the complainant reached his house. Kuljit Singh son of Sardar Tarlok Singh, resident of Bassi Gulam l, Hoshiarpur. The reason behind the occurrence is that on 18.02.2025, there was a marriage of a son of the Bua of the complainant where Karan alongwith two other young boys came and he complainant side sent them from the house of his Bua. On this account, both parties reached the police station and SHO of the police station got effected compromise between them. day, a talk of compromise was in progress between them but it could not succeed. Hence, prayer for submits that he would have no objection in case any on the petitioner including surrender of fire without admitting or conceding, petitioner would live like a decent human being and mend his ways. He further submits that in case petitioner here the sentence prescribed is more than 07 years, he shall have no objection if the State files an application for cancellation of bail in the contends that would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the status report, That it is submitted that the present FIR was registered against the petitioner by name. There are grave, serious and specific allegations against the petitioner that e complainant was going to his house on his motor cycle and inflicted injuries upon the person of complainant. Somehow complainant managed to escape from the spot by running and reached his house. Complainant was admitted in Civil er MLR there are three injuries upon the person of complainant, out of which injury was caused with sharp weapon and remaining injuries were caused with blunt weapon. Injury No.2 and 3 was declared in simple on by the doctor for receiving report of NCCT LFET forearm from GMC, Amritsar. The petitioner has not cooperated in the investigation, has not disclosed the names of unnown person e. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required for proper Jyoti 2025.07.10 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21668 probe and recovery of weapon. Granting bail in a such a case would risk public safety, influence on witnesses and may erode public confidence in justice. Therefore, it is pra justice.” REASONING: 7. Main injury which is grievous is attributed to petitioner but the same is on the arm. Prosecution pleaded that only recovery of weapon is to be effected, which can be done by joining necessary. 8. Pre-trial incarceration should not be a replica of post evidence might be prima facie sufficient to launch prosecution or to frame this Court is not considering the evidence at that stage but is analyzing it for the stage of anticipatory bail. An analysis of the above does not justify custodial interrogation or pre trial incarceration. 9. Given the above, the penal provisio analysis of the nature of allegations and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for custodial interrogation or the pre stage. 10. Without commenting on the c to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail. CONDITIONS: 11. Given above, petitioner shall be to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and if the matter is before a Court, then the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty Magistrate. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Officer/Court must be satisfied that if the accused fails to appear, such surety can produce the accused. 12. While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following personal identification 1. AADHAR number 2. Passport number (If available) and when the attesting officer/court considers it appropriate or considers the accused a flight risk. 3. Mobile number (If available) 4. E- 21668-2025 3 probe and recovery of weapon. Granting bail in a such a case would risk public safety, influence on witnesses and may erode public confidence in justice. Therefore, it is prayed that the present may kindly be dismissed in the interest of justice.” REASONING: Main injury which is grievous is attributed to petitioner but the same is on the Prosecution pleaded that only recovery of weapon is to be effected, which can be e by joining petitioner into investigation and for that custodial interrogation is not trial incarceration should not be a replica of post evidence might be prima facie sufficient to launch prosecution or to frame this Court is not considering the evidence at that stage but is analyzing it for the stage of anticipatory bail. An analysis of the above does not justify custodial interrogation or pre trial incarceration. Given the above, the penal provisions invoked coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for custodial interrogation or the pre Without commenting on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail. CONDITIONS: Given above, provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the petitioner shall be released on bail in the FIR captioned above subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and if the matter is before a Court, then the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty e. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Officer/Court must be satisfied that if the accused fails to appear, such surety can produce the accused. While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following personal identification details: AADHAR number Passport number (If available) and when the attesting officer/court considers it appropriate or considers the accused a flight risk. Mobile number (If available) -Mail id (If available) probe and recovery of weapon. Granting bail in a such a case would risk public safety, influence on witnesses and may erode public confidence in justice. yed that the present may kindly be dismissed in the interest of Main injury which is grievous is attributed to petitioner but the same is on the Prosecution pleaded that only recovery of weapon is to be effected, which can be into investigation and for that custodial interrogation is not trial incarceration should not be a replica of post-conviction sentencing. The evidence might be prima facie sufficient to launch prosecution or to frame charges, but this Court is not considering the evidence at that stage but is analyzing it for the stage of anticipatory bail. An analysis of the above does not justify custodial interrogation or pre- ns invoked coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for custodial interrogation or the pre-trial incarceration at this ase's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail. provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the released on bail in the FIR captioned above subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and if the matter is before a Court, then the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty e. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Officer/Court must be satisfied that if the accused fails to appear, such surety can produce the accused. While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following Passport number (If available) and when the attesting officer/court considers it appropriate or probe and recovery of weapon. Granting bail in a such a case would risk public safety, influence on witnesses and may erode public confidence in justice. yed that the present may kindly be dismissed in the interest of Main injury which is grievous is attributed to petitioner but the same is on the Prosecution pleaded that only recovery of weapon is to be effected, which can be into investigation and for that custodial interrogation is not conviction sentencing. The charges, but this Court is not considering the evidence at that stage but is analyzing it for the stage of - ns invoked coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations and the other factors peculiar to this case, there trial incarceration at this ase's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the released on bail in the FIR captioned above subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and if the matter is before a Court, then the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty e. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Officer/Court must be satisfied While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following Jyoti 2025.07.10 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21668 13. This order is subject to the petitioner’s complying with the following terms. The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, browbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case or dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police or the Court. 14. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days of uploading this order on the official webpage of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and as and when called by the Investigator and cooperate in the recovery of weapon shall be in deemed custody for Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 23 of BSA, 2023. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer or any Superior Officer and shall cooperate with the investig all further stages as required. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution will be open to seeking cancellation of the bail. During the investigation, the petitioner shall not be subjected to third 15. In case the Investigator/Officer arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above, then this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the Investigator/Officer days, providing an opportunity to avail the remedies available in law. 16. It is clarified that if the petitioner violates any bail condition, the State and/or the victim may file an application for bail cancellation before the trial court, which shall be competent to cancel the bail or add more conditions. Furthermore, if the petitioner moves for deletion or dilution of any bail conditions, the trial court is empowered to do so 17. This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner indulges in any non of this bail before the Sessions Court, which shall have the liberty to cancel 18. Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case's merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments. 19. A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petit official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants 21668-2025 4 This order is subject to the petitioner’s complying with the following terms. The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, rowbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case or dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police or the Court. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days of uploading this order on the official webpage of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and as and when called by the Investigator and cooperate in the recovery of weapon shall be in deemed custody for Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 23 of BSA, 2023. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer or any Superior Officer and shall cooperate with the investig all further stages as required. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution will be open to seeking cancellation of the bail. During the investigation, the petitioner shall not be subjected to third-degree, indecent language, inhuman treatme In case the Investigator/Officer-In-Charge of the concerned Police Station arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above, this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the vestigator/Officer-In-Charge shall give the petitioner notice of a minimum of seven days, providing an opportunity to avail the remedies available in law. It is clarified that if the petitioner violates any bail condition, the State and/or the ile an application for bail cancellation before the trial court, which shall be competent to cancel the bail or add more conditions. Furthermore, if the petitioner moves for deletion or dilution of any bail conditions, the trial court is empowered to do so This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner indulges in any non-bailable offense, the State may file an application for cancellation of this bail before the Sessions Court, which shall have the liberty to cancel Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case's merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments. A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petitioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants This order is subject to the petitioner’s complying with the following terms. The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, rowbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case or dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police or the Court. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days of uploading this order on the official webpage of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and as and when called by the Investigator and cooperate in the recovery of weapon. The petitioner shall be in deemed custody for Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 23 of BSA, 2023. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer or any Superior Officer and shall cooperate with the investigation at all further stages as required. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution will be open to seeking cancellation of the bail. During the investigation, the petitioner shall not be degree, indecent language, inhuman treatment, etc. Charge of the concerned Police Station arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above, this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the Charge shall give the petitioner notice of a minimum of seven days, providing an opportunity to avail the remedies available in law. It is clarified that if the petitioner violates any bail condition, the State and/or the ile an application for bail cancellation before the trial court, which shall be competent to cancel the bail or add more conditions. Furthermore, if the petitioner moves for deletion or dilution of any bail conditions, the trial court is empowered to do so. This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner bailable offense, the State may file an application for cancellation of this bail before the Sessions Court, which shall have the liberty to cancel this bail. Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case's merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments. A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any ioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants This order is subject to the petitioner’s complying with the following terms. The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, rowbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days of uploading this order on the official webpage of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and as and r shall be in deemed custody for Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 23 of BSA, 2023. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the ation at all further stages as required. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution will be open to seeking cancellation of the bail. During the investigation, the petitioner shall not be Charge of the concerned Police Station arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above, this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the Charge shall give the petitioner notice of a minimum of seven It is clarified that if the petitioner violates any bail condition, the State and/or the ile an application for bail cancellation before the trial court, which shall be competent to cancel the bail or add more conditions. Furthermore, if the petitioner moves This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner bailable offense, the State may file an application for cancellation Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any ioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants Jyoti 2025.07.10 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21668 to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. 20. Petition allowed stand disposed of. 03.07.2025 Jyoti-IV 21668-2025 5 to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. Petition allowed in terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 03.07.2025 IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. in terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may in terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, Jyoti 2025.07.10 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document