[2025:RJ-JP:44801] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15845/2025 Life Care Hospital, Kothawda Mod, Chaksu, District Jaipur Through Its Director, Irfan Mohammad Son Of Shri Abdul Rashid, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Chaksu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Medical And Health Department, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Second, Mini Swasthya Bhawan, Sethi Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 07/11/2025 1. This petition has been filed against the cancellation order dated 08.10.2025 of registration certificate of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.3 issued an order dated 08.10.2025 against the petitioner, whereby, the registration certificate has been cancelled in utter disregard to Section 32 of the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2010). As per the Section 32 of the Act of 2010, 3 months notice is required whereas, only 3 days notice was issued to the petitioner and thus, no fair opportunity of being heard has been [2025:RJ-JP:44801] (2 of 2) [CW-15845/2025] provided to the petitioner, therefore, the action of the respondents in canceling the registration certificate of the petitioner-Hospital is bad in eyes of law. Hence, the petition be allowed and the cancellation order dated 08.10.2025 be quashed and set aside. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. 4. As per Section 36 of the Act of 2010, any person aggrieved by an order passed under the Act, may prefer an appeal against such order, therefore, equal efficacious relief is available to the petitioner. Hence, this Court does not deems it fit to entertain this writ petition. 5. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /26