Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46609] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13190/2025 Arbaz Urf Keeda S/o Iliyas, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Patpara, Old City, Police Station Kotwali, Dholpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan with Mr. Sagir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 19/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.412/2025 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Section 303(2) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the grounds of arrest were not communicated to the family members of the petitioner in terms of well established law. Though eight cases are pending against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. In support of his contentions,
learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mihir Rajesh Shah v.
[2025:RJ-JP:46609] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13190/2025] State of Maharashtra & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of
2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 20.08.2025. Charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Arbaz Urf Keeda S/o Iliyas be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Jawahar Circle District Jaipur City (East) in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails
[2025:RJ-JP:46609] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13190/2025] to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/98