[2025:RJ-JP:49375] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13213/2025 1. Sant Kumar S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kanjar Basti Polyada, Thana Duni, District Tonk (Raj.). (Confined In District Jail, Bundi). 2. Nitin S/o Rajendra, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kanjar Basti Polyada, Thana Duni, District Tonk (Raj.). (Confined In District Jail, Bundi). 3. Ankur S/o Gyanchand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kanjar Basti Polyada, Thana Duni, District Tonk (Raj.). (Confined In District Jail, Bundi). ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sharan Singh Tanwar, CI, IO & SHO Dooni (Tonk) Dr. Satish Joharwa, CHC, Dooni, Tonk HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 174/2025 registered at Police Station Dooni District Tonk for the offence(s) under Sections 121(1), 132, 109(1), 304(2) & 189(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. In compliance with the directions passed in order dated 26.11.2025, the Investigating Officer as well as the Medical Officer have marked their attendance. The Medical Officer has stated that the font and handwriting in future medical reports will be improved, and a legible and comprehensible medical report shall [2025:RJ-JP:49375] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13213/2025] be prepared, henceforth. The Investigating Officer has explained the matter and submitted that police authorities from different States attempted to interfere with their functioning. The Medical Officer has further stated that the examination was conducted after a lapse of two months, and the injuries sustained are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the applicants. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that there is no criminal antecedent against the applicants; that the medical was conducted after a lapse of two months; that the nature of injuries are simple in nature and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge them on bail. 5. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Sant Kumar S/o Ramprasad, Nitin S/o Rajendra & Ankur S/o Gyanchand shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/62