Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84899 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14921 of 2025 Applicant :- Madhur Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- In Person Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard applicant in person and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred as 'BNSS') has been filed seeking following relief:- "यह अत्यन्त सम्ममानपपूररक पमाररनमा ककी जमातती हहै कक ममाननतीय न्यमायमालय अपर पधमान पमारररमाररक न्यमायमाधतीश कक्ष ससंख्यमा-04 कमानपपुर नगर दमारमा करधधक ररकररती पमाररनमा पत्र ससंख्यमा -375/2025 (ररननेश कमशमा एसंर अन्य बनमाम मधपुर कमशमा) अन्तगरत धमारमा 125(3) सती०आर०पती०सती० मम पमाररत आदनेश कदसंनमाक 04.04.2025 कने कररमाकदत, त्रपुकटिपपूरर एसंर अन्यमायपपूरर आदनेश कको रद्द करनम ककी कक पमा करने। यह भती पमाररनमा ककी जमातती हहै कक ममाननतीय उच्च न्यमायमालय मपूल रमाद ससंख्यमा -276/2022 (ररननेश कमशमा एसंर अन्य बनमाम मधपुर कमशमा) र अन्तररम भरर-पकोषर कने आदनेश कदनमासंक 01.08.2024 कको तब तक स्रकगत करनने ककी कक पमा करने। जब तक कक पमारर्थी दमारमा दमाधखिल मपुकदममा ससंख्यमा -372/2025 (मधपुर कमशमा बनमाम ररननेश कमशमा एसंर अन्य) अन्तगरत धमारमा 340 सती०आर०पती०सती०/379 बती०एन०एस०एस० कमा कनस्तमारर न हको जमायने अन्यरमा आरनेदक कको अपपूररनतीय क्षकत र चकोटि पहहसंचनेगती।" 3. Applicant appearing in person submitted that the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 have lodged the case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. making false and baseless allegations and they were awarded interim maintenance by order dated 01.08.2024. Thereafter, opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 have initiated proceedings under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. vide misc. case no. 375 of 2025. It was submitted that before issuance of recovery warrant vide order dated 04.04.2025 no opportunity of hearing or filing objection has been provided to the applicant. It was pointed out that as per provisions of Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. recovery warrants can be issued when the concerned person fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order of court. Applicant further submitted that the impugned order dated 04.04.2025 is against facts and law and thus, liable to be set aside. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the application. 5. So far impugned order dated 04.04.2025 is concerned, it is provided that in case applicant files his objection against the recovery warrants within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Family court concerned expeditiously in accordance with law. For a period of two weeks from today or till the applicants files such an application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in recovery proceedings of the aforesaid case. 6. So far the prayer for staying the order dated 01.08.2024 is concerned, by that order interim maintenance has been granted by the Family court. In view of provisions of Section - 19 of Family Court Act, 1984 and the law laid down in case of Smt. Anjana Mukhopadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023:AHC:2129445, Ashu Jain Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others 2023:AHC:165660 and Liaqat Hussain Vs. Jainab Praveen and Another AIRONLINE 2020 ALL 2497, it is clear that an order of maintenance or interim maintenance passed by Family court is not an interlocutory order and that against such orders, aggrieved person has remedy of revision. It was held that against such order, application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C./528 BNSS is not maintainable. Further, the order of interim maintenance cannot be stayed merely on the ground that an application has been filed by the applicant/husband under Section 340 Cr.P.C./379 BNSS. However applicant would be at liberty to file a criminal revision or to resort appropriate remedy in accordance with law against that order. Thus, the prayer sought by the applicant in respect of order dated 01.08.2024 is refused. 7. The application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of in above terms. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Anand Digitally signed by :- ANAND VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad