Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49139 (RAJ)

KRISHAN GOPAL SON OF KESHAV DEV v. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18365/2025 · 2025-12-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51328] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18365/2025 Krishan Gopal Son Of Keshav Dev, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of C-280, Siddharth Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. University Of Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Higher Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Bansal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondents may be directed to allow the benefit of senior scale, selection scale and consequently promotion on the post of Associate Professor as well as Professor with all consequential benefits. That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in favour of the petitioner may also be awarded to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:51328] (2 of 2) [CW-18365/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /111