Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49135 (AP)

Yarramsetty Sravani alias Ande Sravani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/11993/2025 · 2025-05-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993 OF 2025 Between: Yarramsetty Sravani alias Ande Sravani, W/o Yarramsetty Anjaneyulu, Aged about 33 Years, Occupation Homemaker, Resident of Sannamuru Village Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of police, Prakasam District, Ongole. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Kondapi, Prakasam District. 5. The Station House Officer(SHO), Marripudi Police Station, Marripudi, Prakasam District. 6. Mancha Venkateswarlu, S/o Ramaiah, Aged About 52 Years, Occupation Cultivation, Resident of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. 7. Mancha Venkateswarlu, S/o Kondaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Occupation Government Employee, Resident of Siddavari Street, Chimakurthy Village, Chimakurthy Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents, may m Specifically respondent is not providing police aid to the petitioner and her family members from restrain 6*'" and 7^'' Respondents and their agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at ' an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District, through considering the report of the petitioner dated 15.04.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, discrimination and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, Specifically 5**^ respondent to provide police aid to the petitioner and her family members to the restrain 6*^ and Respondents and their men, agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. men. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, Specifically 5*^ Respondents to provide police aid to the petitioner and her family members to restrain 6 Respondents and their men, agents, assignees and representatives to enter and construct the house at an extent of Ac. 0.01 Cents in survey No.29 of Sannamuru Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: th and 7 APHC010241162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Yarramsetty Sravani Alias Ande Sravani, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 V THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11993 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.5 in not considering the petitioner’s 2. representation dated 15.04.2025 Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits 3. that the petitioners’ representation dated 15.04.2025 will be considered by the concerned respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the concerned respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under 4. Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023, preferably within period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order 5. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// IT.SECTION OFFICER To, \- 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kanigiri, Prakasam 4. The Inspector of Police, Kondapi, Prakasam District. 5. The Station House Officer (SHO), Marripudi Police Station Prakasam District. y Ongole. District. Marripudi, 6. One CC to Sri Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 8. Two CD Copies Pradesh. [OUT] RAM HIGH COURT 1 DATED;06/05/2025 S 15 MAr 2025 S C9i Current section . ORDER WP.No.11993 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS