1 2025:CGHC:52188 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12227 of 2025 • Laxmi Chandrakar W/o Neeraj Kumar Chandrakar Aged About 35 Years Currently Posted As Sub Engineer, Janpad Panchayat Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Additional Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer Officer Panchayat And Rural Development, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 4. Collector Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 27/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been transferred to Janpad Panchayat Mahasamund, District Mahasamund vide order dated 7-10-2025 which 100 kms away from the Janpad Panchayat, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon. He would further submit that the petitioner has eight years old of daughter who is 2 in Class II in her academic session and old aged mother-in-law who is suffering from disease “Retinitis Pigmentosa” due to which she is completely blind and her regular medical checkup is going on on month basis in Sector 9 hospital situated at Bhilai. He would further submit that the petitioner has already submitted representation in this regard before the respondent authorities on 10-10-2025 which is still undecided, therefore, the instant writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority to consider and decide her representation, in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition (s) is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities that the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner which has been submitted on 10-10-2025 as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.K. Nausad Rahaman and others vs. Union of India and others reported in 2022 (12) SCC 1 whereby the personal difficulties have to be ascertained by the employer only, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.10.28 11:10:09 +0530