[2025:RJ-JP:9329] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1683/2024 Nemi Chand Balai S/o Shri Pema Ram Balai, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Luniyawas (Badhal), Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur. At Present Working As Lecturer (Hindi) At Government Senior Secondary School Badhal, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer (H.q.), Secondary, Jaipur. 4. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Badhal Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14976/2024 Heera Lal Damor S/o Shri Dhul Chand Damor, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Laxmipura, Ojariya, Garni, Banswara, At Present Working As Teacher Grade Ii (English) At Government Senior Secondary School, Kela Mela, Block Peepalkhunt, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Special Secretary, Education (Gr.2) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 4. Joint Director, School Education, Udaipur. 5. Chief District Education Officer, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:9329] (2 of 3) [CW-1683/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar-Dy.G.C. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/03/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by this Court in the case of Rajendra Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20867/2012 on 12.08.2024. Counsel submits that both petitions be disposed of in the light of the similar direction as issued in the case of Rajendra Prasad Sharma (Supra). 2. Per contra, counsel for the respondents opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioners but she is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Looking to the fact that controversy involved in the petitions has already been set at rest by this Court in the case of Rajendra Prasad Sharma (Supra) after following the judgment passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat at Jodhpur in the cases of Shailendra Kumar Bhatt Vs. State of Rajasthan; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2250/2013 decided on 20.05.2013 and Dharamveer Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., reported in 2005(5) RDT 1219, both petitions stand disposed of in the light [2025:RJ-JP:9329] (3 of 3) [CW-1683/2024] of the similar direction as issued in the case of Rajendra Prasad Sharma (Supra). 5. Stay applications and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/252-253