Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49128 (AP)

THULASIMGARI JAYARAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10865/2025 · 2025-05-04

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT _ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1Q8fifi OF 2025 Between: Thulasimgari Jayaramaiah, S/o. Narasaiah Fishing Mangala Palem and Buchireddipalem Village, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. aged about 63 years, Occ. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat buildings at Velagapudi, Amaravati District. Guntur 2. .The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, Buchireddipalem Police Station, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Circle Inspector, Buchireddipalem Division SPSR Nellore District. 5. T. Raja, S/o. not known, Aged about 33 years, Recovery/Collection Manager, Shriram City Union Finance iimited, Padmavathi Plaza, Beside Canara Bank, llird Floor, A.K. Nagar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 6. R.V. Suresh Babu, S/o. not known. Aged about 43 (Business), Shriram City Union Finance limited, Padmavathi years, Dy. Manager Plaza, Beside Canara Bank, Ilird Floor, A.K. Nagar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS India praying that in Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the , respondents 2 to 4 against the respondents 5 and 6 despite of their evil acts . and imminent threat to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and complaint dated 10-04-2025 submitted by the petitioner as highly illegal, ^ . arbitrary, .unconstitutional and violative of Rule of Law and violative Article .y 14, 19 and 300-A and spirit of Right to Protection of Life and Personal Liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein to grant protection to life and personal liberty of the petitioner by considering the representation dated 10-04-2025 of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein to grant protection to life and personal liberty of the petitioner by considering the representation dated 10-04-2025 of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. KOPPARTHI SUMATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6:-— The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010208242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10865/202.*; I^'S [3457] S Between: Thulasimgari Jayaramaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.KOPPARTHISUMATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1-GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) / 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10865 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 10.04.2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 10.04.2025 will be considered by the concerned respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition, directing the concerned respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.04.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023, preferably within period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order 2. 3. 4. 5. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-SHAIK MOHD RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat buildings at Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, Buchireddipalem Police Station, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Circle Inspector, Buchireddipalem Division, SPSR Nellore District. 5. One CC to Smt. Kopparthi Sumathi, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.10865 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS