1 APHC010151482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7777/2023 Between: 1. TANAKALA CHALAPATHI RAO, S/O LATE APPA RAO, BUSINESS, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT H.NO.9-108, GAVARA JAGGAYYAPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. KANDREGULA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. LATE SADHU RAO, BUSINESS, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT H.NO.9-21, GAVARA JAGGAYYAPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM COMMISSIONERATE VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, (ACP) LAW AND ORDER POLICE STATION MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LAW AND ORDER POLICE STATION, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. DADI SRI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O SRI RAMULU, REALTOR, HINDU, AGED 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.15-1-36, DASPALLA HILLS, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. DADI SANTHI KUMARI, W/O ESWARA RAO, HOUSE WIFE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTHAVALASA, VIZIANAGARAM DIST., 7. DADI PADMA, W/O KASI KALI VISWESWARA RAO, HOUSE WIFE, HINDU , AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT SATHIVANIPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. DADI KALI KASI VISWESWARA RAO, S/O SRI RAMULU, BUSINESS, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT SATHIVANIPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in interfering into civil disputes and threatening to dispossess the Petitioners and the society from the Landed Property in an extent of Ac.8.73 cents., covered by S.No.325/1, 325/2, 325/3. TD.No.186, situated at Sathivanipalem Village, H/o Narava, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal irregular, arbitrary violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondent No.2 to 4 not to interfere into the civil disputes and pass.” 2. Heard Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. It is a case of interference of police in a civil dispute. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the complaint made by respondent No.5, police registered a case against the petitioners herein and others in Crime No.79 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 427 read with 34 IPC. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 12.12.2025 Asr 3 302 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7777 of 2023 Dt..12.12.2025 Asr