1 2025:CGHC:52415 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12285 of 2025 Pradeep Sharma S/o Late Shri Madhav Sharan Sharma Aged About 60 Years Working As Block Education Officer, Devbhog, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Under Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Education Officer Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Yogesh Kumar Patel Originally Presently Posted As Assistant Programme Coordinator, District Project Office, Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Deeksha Bharati Jaiswal, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For State : Mr. Luv Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 28.10.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the respondent No. 1 by which the petitioner’s suspension has been revoked and he has been posted to his substantive post of Lecturer at Government Higher Secondary School, Kirvai, Block Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband and two increment without cumulative effect has also been withheld. BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.10.29 10:38:27 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was working as Incharge Block Education Officer, Devbhog, therefore posting of the petitioner on the post of Lecturer is illegal and would pray for allowing the instant petition. 3. Per contra learned counsel for the State opposing the submission would submit that the petitioner holds the substantive post of Lecturer therefore, he has rightly been posted to his place of posting. He would further submit that a government servant has no right to continue to hold the post at particular place of posting forever. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the rival submission made by the parties and also considering the fact that the petitioner is holding substantive post of Lecturer and his charge has been withdrawn as such there is neither violation of any rules or regulation nor infringement of fundamental right of the petitioner, therefore, I am of the view that no interference of this Court is called for and the impugned order dated 25.09.2025 so far as imposition of punishment is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse of remedy by filing an appeal under Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966 for redressal of grievance. 6. With the aforesaid liberty and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika