SRI KRISHNA TRADESR , LOCHERLA RETAIL DEALER v. STATE
CRLP/5078/2025 · 2025-05-05
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49120 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49120 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N 1° CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5078 OF 2025 Between:
1. Sri Krishna Traders, Locherla Retail Dealer, Represented by Sri M. Kasi Naidu, S/o. Simhachalam, Locherla Village, Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh PIN:535126 (A-1)
2. Sree Lakshmi Enterprises, Vizianagaram Distributor (Whole Sale Dealer), Represented by Sri D.Subramanyam, S/o. late Ramakrishna Aged 67 years, Kolia Bazaar, VIZIANAGArAJM - 535 001 (A-2)
3. Green Star Fertilizers Limited Manufacturer and supplier. Represented by Sri T. Balachandar, Manager, S/o. Thavamani (QC.PEG & ISO) aged 37 years, D.No.11-401, 4th floor. Opposite SIRI’s Company, Krishna Nagar, KANURU Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, PIN; 521 139 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. State, Represented by the Assistant Director of Agriculture (Regular) BOBBILI, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh ...1®^ RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Publie Prosecutor, High Court at Amravati, Andhra Pradesh RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS 2023, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the High Court may be pleased to quash the petitioners/accused in C.C.No.2096 of 2023 proceedings against on the file of THE ADDITIONAL JUBICIAL FIRST CLAS MAGISTRATE AT VI2IANAGARAM, 19 (a) (b} of The Fertilizer (Control Order)-1985 read with section 7 (I) (a) (il) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in the interest of justice. registered U/S.
I.A. NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying that in the of Criminal Petition, of the certified copy of on the file of Hon’ble the Class, Vizianagaram, against the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing the Complaint copy in C.C. No. 2096 of 2023 Additional Judicial Magistrate of First petitioners/Accused (A1 to A3). LA. NO: 2 OF 209*; Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying that in the circumstances stated In the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY further of 2023 on the file of THE proceedings in C.C.No.2096 ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS registered U/S. 19 (a) (b) of The Fertilizer (Control Order)-1985 read with section 7 (I) (a) (ii) of Essential Commodities 1955, till the disposal of the Criminal petition.
MAGISTRATE AT VIJAYANAGARAM This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Advocate for the Petitioner Haranadha Raju Katta Prosecutor of A.P. and the Public on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and none appeared for the Respondent No.1. The Court made the following:
APHC010239112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5078/2025 Between; Sri Krishna Tradesr, Locherla Retail Dealer and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S) AND State and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. HARANADHA RAJU KATTA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. The Court made the following: In Criminal Petition the petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.2096 of 2023, on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vizianagaram. 2. It is submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are charged with committing the alleged offences under Section
2 Rs L: 19(a) and (b) of the Fertilizer (Control) order, 1985, read with Section 7(i)a(ii) of - the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. It is submitted that the 1®* petitioner is shown as a retail dealer, 2'^'^ petitioner is shown as Whole Sale Dealer of the Manufacturing Company M/s Green Star Fertilizers Limited, Vijayawada and 3'''^ petitioner is shown as employee of M/s Green Star Fertilizers Limited, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu.
3.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the samples of the seeds manufactured by the respective companies were drawn for testing. Upon receipt of the report of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Fertilizer Proving Center, the samples were found to be non-standard. On the strength of the said report, the 1®^ respondent has filed the complaint before the Court.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the judgment of the High Court for the State of Karnataka in W.P.No.15071 of 2023. The initiation of criminal prosecution for alleged offences under the Fertilizer Control
Order and the Essential Commodities Act was considered by the Karnataka High Court. In that case, the manufacturer of the subject fertilizer was not arraigned as an accused, and it was held that without arraigning the company, the petitioners cannot be held vicariously liable. On these grounds, the writ petition was allowed, and the proceedings before the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class were quashed.
6. A similar view was taken by the Karnataka High Court in the matter of Zuari Agro Chemicals Limited vs. State of Karnataka in Crl.P.No.101492 of
2022.
3 The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar, in
7. Crl.M.Nos.496 of 2021 and 878 of 2021, has taken a similar view. In those cases, the petitioners were shown as officers of the company and were shown as accused. Admittedly, the petitioners are not the manufactures of the seeds whose sample were drawn by the respondent No.1 authority for the purpose of testing. Without arraigning the manufacturing of the seeds, the criminal liability cannot fastened on the employees of the company. Considering the submissions, this Court, it in its considered opinion.
8. following the judgments of the High Court for the State of Karnataka, holds that the prosecution lodged by the 1 respondent cannot withstand the scrutiny of law.
9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. C.C.No.2096 of 2023, on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vizianagaram, is hereby quashed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. \ J Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Additional Judicial First Class Vizianagaram District.
2. One CC to Sri Haranadha Raju Katta, Advocate [OPUC].
3. Two CC’s to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies Magistrate, Vijayanagaram Pradesh GPC
HIGH COURT DATED: 06/05/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.5078 of 2025 0 8 JUL 2U25 1 ^sCuiTeirt Sectioijx^' m Cf> ALLOWING This crlp