P GURUNATH SETTY AND SONS v. B THIPPESWAMY S/O LATE B OBI REDDY
RSA/5133/2008 · 2025-01-30
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1873 RSA No. 5133 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 5133 OF 2008 (PAR-) BETWEEN:
P. GURUNATH SETTY AND SONS A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY, R/B ITS KARTHA SRI P. G. NAGABHUSHAN S/O. P. GURUNAT, AGE. 67 YEARS, COLLEGE RAOD, HOSPET, BELLARY DT. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K RAGHAVEDRA RAO AND SMT.V. VIDYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. B. THIPPESWAMY S/O. LATE B. OBI REDDY, AGE: 66 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESSMAN, R/O. CAR STREET, HAMPI, HOSPET TALUK.
2. R. VENKATARAMANADAS, S/O. RAJAGOPAL, AGE: MAJOR, MERCHANT, R/O: D. NO. 9, 1ST WARD, HAMPI, TQ: HOSPET. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GODE NAGARAJA SIRIGERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2-SERVED - UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.07.2008 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN)., HOSPET IN M.A.NO.20/06 AS WELL AS THE ORDER DATED 20.11.2006 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN)., HOSPET ON I.A.NO.4 IN EX.CNO.57/02, WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.01 11:43:11 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1873 RSA No. 5133 of 2008
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Smt. V. Vidya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Gode Nagaraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, submitted that the prayer made in this appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is
disposed of as having become infructuous.
In view of disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are
disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
YAN CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41