Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ APHC010332272023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■Js> FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16995 OF 2023 Between; Kayyala Narayana, S/o Kayyala Rama Chandraiah, Aged about 35 years, R/o 00, Ayyapa reddy Palem, Mittapalem, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Naidupeta Mandal, Tirupati District. 4. The Sub Inspector of police, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide 567 on the file of the 4th Respondent police station illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the as and same. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents direct the respondents-police to remove the Suspect Sheet against the petitioner on the file of 4th Respondent police station pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
f'. APHC010332272023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY.THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16995/2023 Between:
1.KAYYALA NARAYANA, S/0 KAYYALA RAMA CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/0 00, AYYAPA REDDY PALEM, MITTAPALEM, NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAIDUPETA MANUAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide 567 on the file of the 4th Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India
2 and violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the same and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2023 \ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents direct the respondents-police to remove the Suspect Sheet against the petitioner station pending disposal of the above writ petition and Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME the file of 4th Respondent police on pass
3 •f' The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: ...Ao issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents m opening a suspect sheet vide 567 on the file of the 4th Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of orders conseguently to set aside the same and pass. ” Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home of counter affidavit, would submit that to curb and curtail the AP Standing
2. by way unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, suspect sheet was opened against the Petitioner. Sri Siva Prasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no cases are pending against the petitioner. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned a suspect sheet vide 567 on the file of the 4‘^ Respondent police station, against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. ...
3.
4. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District.
4. The Sub Inspector of police, Naidupeta, Tirupati District.
5. One CC to Sri. Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP For Home ,High Court of Andhra Pradesh
7. Two CD Copies. Naidupeta Mandal, Tirupati [OUT] AL
HIGH COURT DATED:25/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 16995 OF 2023 ANOg^ g( 16 OCT 2025 'Ot rnf _«>»' ALLOWING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS