OM PARKASH v. GULSHAN KUMAR ALIAS SONU AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/22162/2025 · 2025-08-08
Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49113 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49113 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CRM-M-22162-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.08.2025. Om Parkash ...Petitioner. Versus Gulshan Kumar @ Sonu and another ...Respondents. ***
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Complaint No.COMI-402 of 2017 pending before the trial Court, whereby petitioner has been summoned for the offence under Section 306 IPC vide summoning order dated
04.04.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in compliance of
order dated 28.04.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already surrendered before the learned trial Court and facing the trial and has produced on record order of trial Court dated 30.04.2025. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is allowed and the relief, as extended to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 28.04.2025, is hereby made absolute. KOMAL 2025.08.08 17:31 I attest to the accuracy of this document
CRM-M-22162-2025 (O&M) -2- However, the petitioner shall continue regularly appearing before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing. If petitioner will become absent before trial Court then this order shall stand vacated.
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE
08.08.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.08.08 17:31 I attest to the accuracy of this document