- 1 - HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR & SRI M.N.UMASHANKAR, MEMBER WRIT APPEAL NO. 1118 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC) (Lok Adalat No.30/2022) BETWEEN S.Nagaraju, Aged about 58 years, C/o KSRTC Staff and Workers Federation, (AITU) No.6, Sirur Park Road, Sheshadripuram, Bengaluru-560020. ...Appellant (By Sri V.S.Naik, Advocate) AND 1. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Central Office, K.H.Road, Bengaluru-560027 Represented by it MD. 2. The Chief Traffic Manager, KSRTC Central Office, K.H.Road, Shanthinagar, Bengaluru-560027. …Respondents (By Sri B.L.Sanjeev, Advocate) This Writ Appeal is filed u/s 4 of the High Court of Karnataka Act praying to set aside the order passed in Writ Petition No.35733/2010(L-KSRTC) dated 23.01.2012. - 2 - This Appeal coming on for conciliation before National Lok Adalat, the following conciliation order is passed. CONCILIATION ORDER In this writ appeal, the appellant has prayed for setting aside the order dated 23.01.2012 passed by this court in W.P.No.35733/2010. 2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at a settlement voluntarily. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a joint memo duly signed by them. Parties admit the contents of the joint memo. The joint memo shall be read as part and parcel of this order. 3. Therefore, in terms of the joint memo, the writ appeal is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CKL CT: BL - 3 - FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WA.NO.1118/2012 (LOK ADALAT NO. 30/2022) BETWEEN S. NAGARAJU …Petitioner AND: KSRTC …Respondent JOINT MEMO The WA filed by the Appellant against the order passed in WP.35733/2010 has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the order may kindly be modified as under: 1. The dismissal order is set aside and the Respondent – Corporation is agreed to extend the continuity of service from the date of dismissal till the date of superannuation for the purpose of gratuity only. 2. The workman is not entitled for consequential benefits and backwages or any monetary benefits during this period. 3. This settlement is not precedent in other cases. 4. The Appellant-workman agrees for the above terms. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 08.03.2025 at Bengaluru Bench. Sd/- Sd/- SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT/S Sd/- Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/S