REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF RAJ ANR v. BANE SINGH AND ANR
WRW/39/2014 · 2025-11-21
Ganesh Ram Meena
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 39/2014 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2733/2006
1. The Registrar, University Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. Vice Chancellor, University Of Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus
1. Bane Singh Son Of Shri Jaswant Singh, Chouth Ka Barawara, District Sawai Madhopur .....Respondent/petitioner
2. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Performa Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.A. Katta with Mr. R.K. Paliwal & Mr. M.K. Dhakad For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 21/11/2025
1. This review petition has been filed by the review petitioner seeking recalling/reviewing of the order dated 25.07.2012 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2733/2006.
2.
Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the writ petition filed by the respondent/petitioner was covered by the judgment of this Court passed in case of A.S. Badrilal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.- S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2489/2006, decided on 05.02.2009. He further submits that the case of A.S. Badrilal (supra) was decided by the Co-
[2025:RJ-JP:47215] (2 of 2) [WRW-39/2014] ordinate Bench of this Court in light of the order passed by the Court in case of Dayalal & (6) ors Vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2003) 3 WLC 599. He also submits that against the judgment passed by this Court in case of Dayalal (supra), the State of Rajasthan preferred Civil Appeals Nos.486-495 of
2011. The appeals were disposed of vide judgment dated 13.11.2011 and the judgment passed by this Court in case of Dayalal (supra) was set aside by allowing appeals filed by the State. He further submits that since the main judgment, which is being relied upon to decide the petition filed by the respondent /petitioner, has already been set aside by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the order dated 25.07.2012 deserves to be recalled.
3. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent/petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid legal position, the Court deems just and proper to recall the order dated 25.07.2012.
5. Accordingly, this review petition (writ) is allowed and the order dated 25.07.2012 is recalled and the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2733/2006 is restored to its original number and status.
6. Since the main petition has been allowed, the stay application and pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /Shruti/39