APHC010069872021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4159 OF 2021 Between: 1. Karra Brahmeswara Sarma, S/o Satyanarayana Murthy aged about 55 Yrs. Hindu, Pvt. Employee, R/o No.5, 2nd Floor, Sri Krishna Apartments, H.No.7/2A Bhaktavatsalam Street, Mylapur, Chennai-600004. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of A P, rep. by Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi. Velagapudi-522503.Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada-533001. 3. The SubInspector of Police, Ambajipeta P.S. Ambajipeta-533214. East Godavari District. 4. Karra Bulli Brahmeswara Sarma, S/o Satyanarayana Murthy aged about 53 Yrs. Hindu, cultivation, R/o H.No.2-91-1, Chiratapudi (v)-533229. Ambajipeta Mandal. E.G.Dist. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in registering the crime No 194 of 2020 and harrassing the petitioner at the active instance and influence of the 4th respondent with a view to deprive off the legitimate right of the petitioner in claiming share in the property of the petitioner's adopted father Karra Satyanarayana Murthy and pressurizing the petitioner to relinquish his rights infavour of the 4th respondent under the guise of the FIR vide Cr.No.194/2020 ignoring of the pendency of the civil suit vide in 0.S.No.224/2020 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judge court, Amalapuram as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently order not to interfer into the personal life and liberty of the petitioner pursuant to FIR in Cr.N0.194/2020 registered by the 3rd respondent and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction, directing the respondents 2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian constitution and without following the procedure required to be followed under the law, under the guise of the registration of FIR vide in Cr.No.194/2020 by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the main writ petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:G RAMA GOPAL THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4159 of 2021 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in registering the crime No 194 of 2020 and harassing the petitioner at the active instance and influence of the 4th respondent with a view to deprive off the legitimate right of the petitioner in claiming share in the property of the petitioner's adopted father Karra Satyanarayana Murthy and pressurizing the petitioner to relinquish his rights in favour of the 4th respondent under the guise of the FIR vide Cr.No.194/2020 ignoring of the pendency of the civil suit vide in 0.S.No.224/2020 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judge court, Amalapuram as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently order not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the petitioner pursuant to FIR in Cr.N0.194/2020 registered by the 3rd respondent...” 2. Heard Sri Pappu Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents and Sri G.Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit police are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent and forcing him to relinquish his rights in favour of the 4th respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents would submit that in the light of the interim direction passed by this Court, police are not calling the petitioner to the police station and the police never insisted the petitioner to relinquish his rights in favour of the 4th respondent and are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. 5. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute, except under due process of law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025 Dvs THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 238 WRIT PETITION NO: 4159 of 2021 Date: 08.10.2025 Dvs