MULUK SEIKH @ JILLAR SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/4517/2024 · 2025-01-09
Gaurang Kanth, Joymalya Bagchi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49103 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49103 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.01.2025 14 sdas Rejected
C.R.M. (A) No. 4517 of 2024
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Daulatabad Police Station Case No. 154 of 2024 dated 06.06.2024 under Sections 498A/376/307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. And In Re : Muluk Seikh @ Jillar Sk. .….. petitioner
Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak ..…for the petitioner
Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee Ms. Snigdha Saha ….. for the State
Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain Ms. Chandrima Debnath ….. for de facto complainant
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits he is brother-in-law of the victim lady. He has been falsely implicated due to matrimonial dispute. Accordingly, he prays for anticipatory bail.
2. Learned advocates for the State and de facto complainant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. We have considered the materials on record including statement of the de facto complainant. She alleges on 05.03.2024 petitioner forcibly raped her. When she informed her husband he misbehaved with her. She took refuge at her
2 parental home and lodged FIR. In light of the unequivocal allegation relating to rape we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)