[2025:RJ-JP:48291-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 563/2024 Chetan Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Babu Lal Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Namak Ka Katra, Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shailee Krishnani, Secretary, Rajasthan Devasthan Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Mr. Vasudev Malawat, Commissioner, Rajasthan Devasthan Department, Near Panchwati, Meera Vaishya College, Udaipur 3. Mr. Gaurav Soni, Assistant Commissioner, Rajasthan Devasthan Department, Near Panchwati, Meera Vaishya College, Udaipur 4. Krishan Kumar Khandelwal, Assistant Commissioner, Rajasthan Devasthan Department, Vradawan, Jaipur Mandir, District Mathura 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rajasthan Devasthan Department, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Suresh Kashyap For Respondent(s) : Mr.Samee Khan for Mr.Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr.Shivam Chauhan, AGC Ms.Epsa Nangalia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 27/11/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 20.10.2023 passed by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court, whereby directions were issued to [2025:RJ-JP:48291-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-563/2024] the respondents to examine and consider the case of the petitioner for regularization on the post of Chokidar. In view of the directions issued by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the respondents have examined the matter of the petitioner and after due consideration, the order dated 06.02.2024 has been passed, which is annexed as Annexure-3. 3. Learned counsel submits that the directions were issued to regularize the services of the petitioner and since the same has not been done, therefore, the respondents have committed willful disobedience of the order passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court and they may be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the directions of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court was only to the extent of considering and examining the petitioner’s case for regularization and after considering the case of the petitioner, the respondents have passed the order dated 06.02.2024. Therefore, the order passed by this Court has been been complied with and there is no willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. 5. We have considered the submissions made at the bar and have gone through the relevant record of the case. 6. The directions of the learned Single Judge as well as the Division Bench is only to examine and consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services. 7. In pursuance of the directions issued by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 20.10.2023, the respondents have considered and examined the matter of the petitioner for [2025:RJ-JP:48291-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-563/2024] regularization and passed a detailed and speaking order dated 06.02.2024. 8. Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the order has been complied with and there is no willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. 9. The contempt petition is dismissed accordingly. 10. Notices are discharged. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J Monika/62