Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49098 (RAJ)

RATNARAM GURJAR S/O RUGHA GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6774/2025 · 2025-10-27

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42950] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6774/2025 1. Ratnaram Gurjar S/o Rugha Gurjar, R/o Plot No. B-63, B-64, Murti Nagar Vistar, Siwar Road, Bindayaka, Jaipur. 2. Prem Devi Gurjar W/o Ratnaram Gurjar, R/o Plot No. B-63, B-64, Murti Nagar Vistar, Siwar Road, Bindayaka, Jaipur. ---Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ...Respondent no.1 2. Kiran Bhati W/o Hanuman Singh Bhati, R/o B-151, Nityanand Nagar, Gandhi Path, Chitrakoot, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ---Complainant-Respondent no.2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Ashish Sharma with Mr. Anutosh Mishra for Mr. Gajendra Singh Chouhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 27/10/2025 This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 Bharatiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0161 dated 16.06.2025 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for short, ‘complainant’) against the petitioners at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur(West) for the offence under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 329(4), 351(3) and 64(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:42950] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6774/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners, inviting attention of this Court towards the compromise deed dated 08.10.2025, would submit that the private dispute of civil nature has amicably been settled between the parties and prays for quashing the subject FIR arising therefrom. The respondent no.2/complainant-Smt. Kiran Bhati, present in person and identified by her learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the compromise deed dated 08.10.2025, submits that she has no objection if the criminal misc. petition is allowed and the subject FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced at bar, the dispute giving rise to the subject FIR being private and of civil nature, the compromise deed dated 08.10.2025 and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.0161 dated 16.06.2025 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant against the petitioners at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur(West) is quashed and set aside. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /50