MADDIPATLA AADI NARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/33511/2023 · 2025-12-09
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010641572023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33511/2023 Between:
1. MADDIPATLA AADI NARAYANA, S/O SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O PAIKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-
520015. 2. PASUPULETI RAMA CHANDAR RAO, , S/O MUKUNDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O OLD PAIKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520015
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. K SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF PAIKAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAIKAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 5. DANDA MADHU SUDANA RAO, S/O LATE SAMBAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, PROPERTIES R/O D.NO.77-87/1-91, OLD PAIKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-15. 6. MAHANKALI MOHAN RAO, S/O VENKATA SATYANNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO.27-12-70, ALI BAIG STREET, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-520002. 7. SIKAKOLLI SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.41-3-17, BIYYAPUKOTLA BAZAR, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA 520013. 8. MANEPALLI VENKATA NAGADURGA MANIKYALA RAO, S/O B.R.
ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.41-4-62, METLA BAZAR, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA-520013. .IN
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
2
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....
to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents involving in civil dispute with threat miss using official duties by forcing the petitioners to deliver the possession to the respondents 5 to 8 pertaining to the scheduled property in ATC No.2 of 2022 pending before the Special Court under Tenancy Act cum Junior Civil Judge at Vijayawada in respect of Agricultural land with an extent of Ac.1.28 Cents in RS No.52/3A, 52/38 and 52/4 Payakapuram Village, Vijayawada North Mandal is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and voilating of article 21 and 300-A of Constituion of Idnia, voilation of Police Laws and voilation of the provisions of AP Tenancy Act and consquently direct the 3rd respondent respondent not to interfear in Civil dispute during the pending matter before the the Special Court under Tenancy Act cum Junior Civil Judge at Vijayawada and consequantly direct the 2nd respondent to take departmental action against the 3rd respondent for miss using the Official duties”
2. Heard Sri P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the complaint made by respondent No.8 through spandana, both parties were called and forwarded to the Pre Litigation Counseling Forum, which is situated at Sub Collector Office, Vijayawada, for further proceedings. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.12.2025 Asr
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.33511 of 2023
Dt.10.12.2025
Asr