Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49094 (AP)

Kodamanchili Nagavenkata satyaganesh Karteek v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10833/2025 · 2025-10-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010557602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10833/2025 Between: 1. KODAMANCHILI NAGAVENKATA SATYAGANESH KARTEEK, S/O BHAVANI SHANKARA SUBRAMANYAM, HINDU, AGED 35 YEARS, COMMANDER, INDIAN NAVY, ARHITECTURE, ROOM NO 200, NAVAL HEAD QUARTER ANNEXURE BUILIDNG TAIKATORA, INDOOR STIDUM PARK LANE. NEW DELHI ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. KOMPELLA VENKATA LAKSHMI KUSUMA KUMARI ALIAS KODAMANCHILI VENKATA LAKSHMI KUSUMA KUMARI, W/O KODAMANCHILI NAGA VENKATA SATYA GANESH KARTHIK HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D NO 2-58-9/1, 8TH STREET SAMBHU NAGAR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. I BALA SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10833/2025 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 8Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 8BNSS9) has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.1, seeking quashment of proceedings pending against him in C.C.No.2445 of 2022 on the file of IV Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A r/w 34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Heard Sri I. Bala Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working in Delhi and he has to appear before the Trial Court at Rajamahendravaram. It is very difficult for him to attend the Court for every adjournment. He would further submit that the petition may be disposed of, by dispensing the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 3 5. Considering the submissions, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the presence of the petitioner/Accused No.1 before the Trial Court is dispensed with, unless his presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10833/2025 Dated.17.10.2025 UPS 68