DEVINDRA KUMAR SHARMA @ SONU BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA1/594/2025 · 2025-04-08
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4909 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4909 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.594 of 2025
Devendra Kumar Sharma @ Sonu Bhardwaj
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Ms. Poonam Rana, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 255 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that based on three past cases, the applicant has been involved in the instant case. But, out of those three cases, in two cases, the applicant has been on bail in one case and he has been served with a notice under Section 41 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4.
These facts are not denied by learned State counsel.
2
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
7.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 08.04.2025 Jitendra