SHRAWAN ALIAS KARU SONI ALIAS SHRAWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./800/2025 · 2025-02-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4909 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4909 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.800 of 2025
------ Shrawan @ Karu Soni @ Shrawam Kumar aged about 46 years son of Late Ramchandra Soni @ Ramchandra Sao Resident of Bind Muhalla Chatra, P.O.-Sadar, Police Station-Sadar, Dist.-Chatra
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 06-02-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.155 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 326 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that due to village politics, this case has falsely been instituted against the petitioner. It is then submitted that petitioner is the businessman and has no concern with the alleged offence. It is further submitted that there is no material to show the nature of injury sustained by the alleged victim. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra, in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.155 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/