[2025:RJ-JP:44629] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16867/2025 Surendra Singh S/o Maruram Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Khandawa, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. District Collector (Land Record), District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav Mr. Shish Ram Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Another reported as AIR 2015 SC 2389 submits that present petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 03.07.2025 and petitioner is entitled to reinstatement pending inquiry. He further submits that the petitioner was suspended on false allegations and the allegations are not sufficient to warrant suspension. He further submitted that placing a public servant under suspension for a longer duration is also against the public policy. [2025:RJ-JP:44629] (2 of 2) [CW-16867/2025] 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the judgment as referred by learned counsel for petitioner along with material on record. 3. Present petitioner, Surender Singh, Patwari Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan was suspended on 03.07.2025, by the District Collector, Jhunjhunu. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5 Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /114