1 2025:CGHC:53716 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8630 of 2023 Shalini Gupta D/o Shri Kailash Prasad Gupta Aged About 40 Years R/o 52/1500 Kalo Vihar, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Employment And Training, Inderawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Directorate Of Employment Of Training Through- Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training, Inderawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through- Secretary, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Document Verification Committee Durg Zone Appointed By The Directorate Of Employment And Training, District- Baster, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Kale, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate For Respective Respondents : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate and Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 03.11.2025 1. The present petition has been filed with the following relief(s) :- “I. That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction or any other appropriate writ to set aside impugned rejection YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.03 18:38:15 +0530 2 order(Annexure P/1) and direct the respondent no 2 to permit the petitioner to appear for document verification again and consider the experience certificate submitted by the petitioner for the purpose of appointment on the post of workshop Calculation and Engineering Drawing (Trade Code 30); II. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems, fit in the facts and circumstances, may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State having no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh