Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48266] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13144/2025 Mo. Rasool S/o Sadeek, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sainik Nagar, Police Station Kotwali, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Sharma for Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Shravan Kumar, SHO, PS Kotwali HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 27/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 302/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 61(2), 112(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 30 years. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that offences are triable by Magistrate. It is also submitted that complaint is registered by police authorities and no private complaint has come forward.
[2025:RJ-JP:48266] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13144/2025]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Investigating Officer has marked presence in the Court and has submitted that on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (helpline/complaint registering number - 1930), approx. 36 complaints are registered against the accused- applicant, which are from different parts of the country pertaining to 15 States. It is further submitted that amount to the tune of Rs. 83 Lacs has been surfaced out. It is also submitted that mule accounts were also used.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there are 36 complaints registered against the accused-applicant on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal; that huge amount has been siphoned off; that accused-applicant has not disclosed the fact in the application qua the complaints registered on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal against him and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /3