Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49078 (CAL)

PRASANTA SARKAR & ORS v. BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK & ORS

WPA/25079/2012 · 2025-04-21

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21.04.2025 Ct. No.33 Sl. No.67 cm WPA 25079 of 2012 Prasanta Sarkar & Ors. Vs. Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank & Ors. Mr. Indranath Mitra … for the petitioner Mr. Baidurya Ghosal … for the respondent No.1/Bank The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits to have received a written instruction from the petitioner expressing his unwillingness to proceed with the instant writ petition since his grievance has already be resolved. Let the said written instruction be kept on record. The learned advocate representing the respondents/Bank is present. Under such circumstances, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Copy of the order be sent to the Department for compliance. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)