HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7275/2025 1. Bhanwar Singh S/o Shri Dhoji, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Rattiram S/o Shri Dhoji, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Shivram S/o Shri Dhoji, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 4. Jagram S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Visbendra @ Bablu S/o Shri Ratiram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 6. Sooraj S/o Shri Shivram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 7. Fholbati W/o Shri Ajit, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 8. Virma W/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 9. Saroj W/o Shri Ratiram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 10. Omvati W/o Shri Shivram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 11. Manja W/o Shri Jagram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 12. Poonam D/o Shri Ratiram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 13. Priti D/o Shri Shivram, R/o Singhrawali, Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Manoj S/o Shri Hari, R/o Singhrawali, Police Station Halena, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritu Raj Soni (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7275/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Mukesh Choudhary JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/12/2025 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR No.227/2025 registered with the Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 125 BNS, 2023 on the basis of the compromise between the parties. 2. This Court vide order dated 13.11.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise arrived between them. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer and has verified the factum of compromise and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners as they have settled their land dispute and the parties belong to the same family. 3. In view of the aforesaid compromise and the situations narrated herein above and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7275/2025] 4. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR No. 227/2025 registered with the Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 125 BNS, 2023 pending against the petitioners before the Court below are hereby quashed. The petitioners are discharged from the above stated offences. 5. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. Factual report so furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/77