HANUMAN SAHAI SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS
CRLMP/177/2017 · 2025-11-13
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49073 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45618] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.177/2017 Hanuman Sahai Sharma Son of Shri Ramlal Sharma, R/o Makan No.A-16, Sain Colony, Kabeer Marg, Power House Road, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
2. Pratap Singh Son of Shri Chunniram Jat, R/o Makan No.23, Jobner Bag, Pareek Collage Road, Jaipur Metropolitan Jaipur Raj.
3. Murarilal Son of Shri Maliram, R/o Makan No.116, Hari Marg, Civil Lines, Jaipur Metropolitan Jaipur Raj. ----Accused/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma Saraswat with Mr. Dipendra Singh & Mr. Abhishek Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma on behalf of Mr. Saransh Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/11/2025
1. By way of filing the instant criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 13.12.2016, whereby application under Section 391 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the learned Appellate Court.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the accused submits that during the pendency of the instant petition, the trial itself has been decided vide judgment dated 15.04.2017.
3. Hence, in view of above, no cause of action for pursuing the instant petition survives. Thereupon, learned counsel
[2025:RJ-JP:45618] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-177/2017] for the petitioner submits that the complainant has filed revision petition against judgment 15.04.2017, which is pending before this Court and also submits that although, as of now the petition in the present form cannot be pursued. However, liberty may be granted to the petitioner that, in case, his revision petition is allowed and his appeal is restored then he may file an application for revival of the present petition.
4. In the light of above submissions, the present Criminal Miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/27