1 APHC010375212017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31116 OF 2017 Between: 1. K.PAVAN KUMAR, S/o. Late Surya Bhaskara Rao, Aged 31 years, Occ: Computer Operator in PMK Choultry, R/o. D.No.18-16-2 / 4, Krishna Nagar, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. PRL SECRETARY ENDOWMENT AND 2 OTHERS, Rep: by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur. 2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Sri Pandiri Mahadevudu Kotilingala Choultry, (PMK Choultry), Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, Rep: by its Executive Officer. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the time scale to the petitioners as Computer Operator/Junior Assistant Cadre in the 2 3rd respondent institution as illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, violative of Article 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to extend the time scale attached to the post of Computer Operator/Junior Assistant Cadre in the 3rd respondent institution and grant all consequential benefits including the monetary benefits and grant such other relief or relief's as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following order: The writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following main relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the time scale to the petitioners as Computer Operator/Junior Assistant Cadre in the 3rd respondent institution as illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, violative of Article 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to extend the time scale attached to the post of Computer Operator/Junior Assistant Cadre in the 3rd respondent institution and grant all consequential benefits including the monetary benefits and to pass......” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for 3rd respondent jointly submitted that the petitioner was accorded minimum time scale and the cause in the writ petition already fulfilled, as such, no further orders are necessary. To that effect, the 3 learned Standing Counsel for 3rd respondent also placed the proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner and Executive Officer, Sri PMK Choultry, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, dated 12.12.2018. 3. Recording the submission made by both the counsels, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:17.10.2025 Rns 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.31116 of 2017 Date: 17.10.2025 RNS 5