Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49072 (RAJ)

MOMIN KHAN S/O MUFID KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8650/2025 · 2025-10-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41060] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8650/2025 Momin Khan S/o Mufid Khan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Padla, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar, District Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar for Mr. Sabir Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. N. S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 09/10/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 162/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 316(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-C of IT (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 23 years. Learned counsel further submits that allegations levelled against the applicant are limited to a fraud of Rs. 18,000/-. Matter is triable by Magistrate. Applicant is in custody ever since 16.06.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long [2025:RJ-JP:41060] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8650/2025] time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 23 years; that accused-applicant is in custody since 16.06.2025; that the matter is triable by Magistrate and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Momin Khan S/o Mufid Khan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /34