SHUBHAM GUPTA S/O KAMAL CHAND GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/165/2023 · 2025-10-31
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49071 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49071 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 165/2023 Shubham Gupta S/o Kamal Chand Gupta, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Khadhi Ashram, Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. Rajasthan Medical Council, Government Dispensary Campus, Near Sahkar Bhawan, Sardar Patel Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Registrar
3. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
4. Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Through Its Registrar, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur
5. The Coordinator, Medical Officer (Medical) Recruitment Examination-2020, Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Sector -18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur
6. Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Through Its Principal Sector -18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 31/10/2025 Matter comes upon misc. application submitted by the applicant for recalling of the order dated 21.03.2023 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12692/2020.
(2 of 2) [WMAP-165/2023] Counsel for the petitioner submits that when the case was listed before this Court on 21.03.2023, he could not appear due to the circumstances beyond his control, the aforesaid petition has been disposed of in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Pragyan Bansal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11435/2020, decided on 12.10.2020). Counsel submits that the controversy involved in this matter is altogether different with the controversy involved in the case of Pragyan Bansal (Supra). Counsel submits that under these circumstances, the matter is required to be decided on its merit. Considering the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the order dated 21.03.2023 stands recalled and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12692/2020 is ordered to be restored to its original number. Office to proceed further. The misc. application stands disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/149