Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49071 (CHH)

RAHUL CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3434/2025 · 2025-11-13

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55572 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3434 of 2025 1 - Rahul Choudhary S/o Dhaniram Choudhary Aged About 26 Years R/o Near Khudiram Bose Chowk Tarbahar Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Rashmi Choudhary W/o Dhaniram Aged About 47 Years R/o Near Khudiram Bose Chowk Tarbahar Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Sundardas S/o Chabilal Aged About 57 Years R/o Near Khudiram Bose Chowk Tarbahar Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Dhaniram S/o Chabilal Aged About 52 Years R/o Near Khudiram Bose Chowk Tarbahar Police Station Tarbahar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer Police Station- Tarbahar, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Golu Valmiki W/o Ramdas Aged About 30 Years R/o Yadav Mohalla Tikrapara Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Complainant Made As Per Fir) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Trial Court has rejected the application filed under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C. by the petitioners as well as injured. 2. Learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner has challenged the aforesaid order instead of filing a petition for quashing of charges. 3. Looking to the aforesaid facts, the counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition. 4. As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. 5. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima