[2025:RJ-JP:42179] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4867/2025 Santosh Kumar S/o Pappulal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Pali Po- lice Station Pali District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabara). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Avadhesh Meena for Mr. K.N. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Gaurav Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 15/10/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with the FIR No. 490/2024 registered at Police Station Chhabra District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 108, 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted ac- cused-applicant is not specifically named in the FIR. It is further submitted that the applicant is behind bars ever since 16.12.2024. Further, it is submitted that criminal antecedents (one in number) is registered against the applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:42179] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4867/2025] 3. Furthermore, it is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed. Lastly, it is submitted that FSL report has not provided any effective result. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant has submit- ted that FIR has suggested name of another person apart from Golu. It is further submitted that FIR is not an encyclopedia. It is further submitted that a weapon/wooden stick has been recovered from the applicant. Lastly, it is submitted that death has occurred on account of head injury. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that injury sustained by the victim are heinous in nature; that weapon used in the alleged incident has been recovered from the accused-applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicant. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/12