1 CRWP-4177-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CRWP-4177-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 29, 2025 Rajiv Goel ......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr.Aditya Dassaur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab. ---- SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) The present writ petition is under Article 226 of Constitution of India for seeking issuance of direction in the nature of mandamus for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to ensure that the petitioner’s right to life and personal liberty as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, is not violated by respondent No.4 by misusing his official capacity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondent No.4 has issued almost more than 60 traffic challans within a period of 2-3 months. He further contends that respondent No.4 is neighbour of the petitioner. Respondent No.4 is intentionally trying to harass the petitioner by misusing his official powers. He further contends that the petitioner has even moved an application to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali, on 08.04.2025 through registered post, which is placed on record with the present writ petition as Annexure P-5. Till date, no decision has been taken on the Sonia Arora 2025.05.01 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRWP-4177-2025 (O&M) same. He further submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali, is directed to look into the matter and decide the representation dated 08.04.2025 of the petitioner in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and does not object to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Without going into the merits of the case as well as without calling for any reply, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali, to decide the representation dated 08.04.2025 of petitioner which is placed on record as Annexure P-5, within a period of two weeks from today by passing a speaking order thereon dealing with each and every grievance raised by the petitioner. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE April 29, 2025 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes / No Sonia Arora 2025.05.01 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document