Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49066 (AP)

V.Jayaramudu Nayak v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9378/2021 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010166442021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9378/2021 Between: 1. V.JAYARAMUDU NAYAK, S,O SREENU NAYAK AGED ABOUT 26YRS R,O H.NO.4-10, ISRA NAYAK THANDA VILLAGE OWK MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OWK POLICE STATION, OWK, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. SRIKANTH REDDY, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE OWK POLICE STATION OWK, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents more particularly respondent No.3 in not appointing the Investigating Officer to the FIR No.279,2020 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to complete the investigation in FIR No.279,2020 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to initiate appropriate action against the 6th respondent for misusing his powers as stated in representation dt.01-03- 2021 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the espondent No.3 to allot the Investigating Officer to the FIR No.279,2020 pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9378/2021 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents more particularly respondent No.3 in not appointing the Investigating Officer to the FIR No.279/2020 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to complete the investigation in FIR No.279/2020…” 2. Heard Sri B.Sarvotham Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV 4 159 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9378/2021 Dt.22.09.2025 JLV