Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66265 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5567 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harprasad And Another Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra,Durga Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The petitioners claim that they are entitled to recomputation of their pension in light of the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission. They have made representations before the competent authority but to no avail. The only prayer made by Shri Brijesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioners may be decided within a stipulated period of time. Shri P.K.Sahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent-State submits that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority in light of the applicable provisions of law in the first instance. However, he fairly contends that their claim for recomputation of pension are liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In wake of the submissions made at the Bar and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.4- Sachiv, Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Chandausi, District-Moradabad is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners regarding recomputation of their pension in light of the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission, as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. The petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 superannuated from service on 31.12.2018 and 31.05.2021 respectively. The petitioners shall not be entitled to interest since no good cause for delay in approaching this Court has been disclosed in the writ petition. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad