APHC010134272007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4014/2007 Between: 1. V.V.R.K. REDDY E. 45092 LEADING HAND, S/O V.C.H. V. REDDY R/O VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE APSRTC REPBYITS DM MTM KRISHNA DIST 2 OTHERS, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE WORKS MANAGER APSRTC ZONAL WORK SHOP, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the action of the 2nd respondent in imposing the punishment of with-holding annual increment for a period of two years with cumulative effect besides treating the suspension period as not on duty vide proc. No. M1/2(8)/2005-AVG., dt.7-9-2006 by alleging crime of theft without there being any criminal complaint or case and finding the criminal court as illegal, without jurisdiction, unjust and arbitrary and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 5133 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date of hearing of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissa’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 21.08.2025 and 18.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 141 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:4014 of 2007 Date: 25.09.2025 MP