Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49062 (MAD)

Rajendiran v. Baskar

CMP/9560/2025 · 2025-07-16

Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.9560 of 2025 in C.M.A.S.R.No.56659 of 2025 SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petition has been filed to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the Appeal in C.M.A.S.R.No.56659 of 2025. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent-2, who is present in Court has no objection in allowing the petition provided the claim of interest for the period of delay of 91 days is waived. 3. Considering the submission of the learned Counsel for the Respondent-2, the petition in C.M.P.No.9560 of 2025 is allowed on condition that the Appellant is not entitled to claim interest for the period of delay of 91 days. 4. Registry is directed to number the Appeal if it is otherwise in order and to print the name of the learned Counsel for the Respondent-2, when the Appeal is listed before the appropriate Bench. 16.07.2025 shl 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., shl C.M.P.No.9560 of 2025 in C.M.A.S.R.No.56659 of 2025 16.07.2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis