IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 296 CRM-M-21618-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2025. Ravinder Singh @ Ravi and others ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Tanya Vashist, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.138 dated 01.04.2025 under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, registered at Police Station City Sohana, District Gurugram and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 07.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sohna, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, KOMAL 2025.07.16 17:20 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-21618-2025 (O&M) -2- learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 08.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.138 dated 01.04.2025 under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, registered at Police Station City Sohana, District Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise deed dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 14.07.2025 Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.07.16 17:20 I attest to the accuracy of this document