APHC010602922015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27764/2015 Between: 1. M/S. HARSHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY R.USHA RANI, W/O. G.HARI KRISHNA NAIDU, AGED: 38 YRS, R/O. 740/3A, PALAKUR ROSD, PUTHALAPATTU, CHITTOOR DIST. 2. M/S. VASANTHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY T.SUBRAMANYAM REDDY, S/O. T.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED: 60 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHINAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. 3. VINAYAKA EMU FARM,, REP. BY M.SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU, S/O. RAGHUNANDA NAIDU, AGED: 50 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MADDIPATLAPALLI, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. 4. SAI KRISHNA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY K. SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. K.RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED: 60 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUBIGALLAM VILLAGE & POST, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. 5. OOHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY K. PALAKSHI NAIDU, S/O.K.KANNAIAH NAIDU, AGED: 44 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAXMIPURAM VILLAGE, N.R.PETA POST, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY JOINT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, DAIRYING & FISHERIES, KRISHI BHAVAN, 2 NEW DELHI-110114. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY & FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABD. 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NABARD REGIONAL, OFFICE, RTC 'X' ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DEPARTMENT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SHANTHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 5. STATE LEVEL BANKERS COMMITTEE OF A P, REP. BY ITS CONVINEOR ANDHRA BANK, PHATTABI BHAVAN, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK, CHITTOOR BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 7. THE BRANCH MANAGER SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA, BANK, KANIPAKAM BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 8. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, KANIPAKAM BRANCH, CHITTOOR DIST. 9. THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, CHITTOOR BRANCH, CHITTOOR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto, issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents No. 1 to 5 in not considering the representations, dated: 04-112013, 23-12-2013, 05-06-2014, Nill , 20-10-2014 and 20-10-2014 of the petitioners to waive the loans which were sanctioned by the 3rd RespondentNABARD pursuant to the introduction of schemes by the 1st respondent-Central Government and also action of the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks in insisting for repayment of loan amount, pending decision of 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondent-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014 as illegal, arbitrary, uncounstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice, and violation of Art. 14, 19 of the constitution of india and consequently direct the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks not to insist the petitioners for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondents-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014 and further direct the Respondents No. 1 to 5 to waive the loans which were advanced to the petitoners by directing the Respondents No. 6 & 9/Banks not to harass the petitioners for repayment of loans and pass 3 such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 36039 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to, direct the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks not to insist the petitioners for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by the 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondents-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 158780 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M SRIKANTH REDDY 2. V UMA DEVI 3. V RAGHU 4. S SIVA KUMARI 5. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: Sri B. Surya Chandra, learned counsel representing Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 23rd September, 2025 cbn 5 633 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.27764 of 2015 23rd September, 2025 cbn