[2025:RJ-JP:47955] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18304/2025 Virendra Pal Singh Son Of Shri Uttam, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Vill/post -Nathu Ji Ka Bara, Nimbeshwar, Barmer, Rajasthan - 344044. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Technical Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretarite, Janpath, Jaiprur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Rajaya Krishi Parbandh Sansthan Parisar, Duragapura, Jaipur 302018. 3. Chairman, Staff Selection Board, Rajasthan, Rajaya Krishi Parbandh Sansthan Parisar, Duragapura, Jaipur 302018. 4. Government Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Skill, Employment And Entrepreneurship Directorate Of Technical Education, Jodhpur, W-6, Residency Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1 Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- (i) Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus quash and set aside the impugned disqualification letter dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure-5) issued by respondent No.4, directing the respondents to consider candidature to appoint the petitioner Roll No. 803651 EWS-M to the post of [2025:RJ-JP:47955] (2 of 3) [CW-18304/2025] Junior Instructor (Computer Lab/IT LAB) against the EWS- resreved vacancies, in accordance with their merit and eligibility, as petitioner I meritorious as he obtained CITS qualification. (ii) Direct the respondents to consider to declare that the petitioner, having qualification and obtained the CITS certificate (Annexure-7) having all relevant qualification, stands fully qualified for appointment and the respondents be directed to issue appointment order forthwith. 2. Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG and Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 4 respectively whereas Nalin G. Narain accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 3. Considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation in light of office memorandum dated 30.06.2023 issued by the Directorate General of Training, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Govt. of India and also in light of legal position as referred by learned counsel in Division Bench Judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in case of Dinesh Kumar and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. [CWP No. 37892/2018 (O & M)] decided on 04.04.2024. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of office memorandum and legal position after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are [2025:RJ-JP:47955] (3 of 3) [CW-18304/2025] under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With aforesaid, the writ petition along with pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /36