Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4905 (JHR)

RAMDHAN MAHATO ALIAS RAMDHAN MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./326/2024 · 2025-04-07

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10770 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 326 of 2024 Ramdhan Mahato @ Ramdhan Mahto, Aged about - 27 years, Son of Late Manohar Mahato, Resident of Village -Bandhdih, P.O.- Lota, P.S-Silli, District - Ranchi … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Manoj Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the State : M/s. P. K. Mishra, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : M/s. Pawan Kumar Pathak,Advocate --- 06/07.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has filed this application for setting aside the order dated 01.09.2023, passed by learned S.D.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Silli P.S. Case No. 99/2019, Corresponding to G.R Case No. 775/2020, registered under sections 498(A), 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, whereby and wherein the learned Magistrate has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under section 317 Cr.P.C. It appears that on 01.09.2023 the petitioner was ordered to remain physically present, as the case was fixed for framing of charge but the petitioner did not appear due to which his application under section 317 Cr.P.C was dismissed. I do not find any illegality in the order dated 01.09.2023, passed by the learned S.D.J.M, Ranchi. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. The petitioner will appear before the learned Magistrate within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order and the learned Magistrate shall consider the prayer of the petitioner for bail and release him on provisional bail till the charge is not framed. This Cr.M.P. is dismissed. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh Uploaded