Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49048 (CHH)

ARADHANA KINDO v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13339/2025 · 2025-11-25

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57447 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13339 of 2025 1 - Aradhana Kindo W/o Aditya Kumar Panna, Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted As Teacher At Govt. Primary Girls School Korea Colliery, Block- Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) 2 - Anuranjan Beck S/o Sant Baras Beck, Aged About 35 Years Presently Posted As Asst. Teacher At Govt. Primary School Shivpur, Block- Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban And Administration And Development Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Director Urban Administration And Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer, District Korea (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Korea, District Korea (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Nagar Palika, Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) 8 - Block Education Officer, Block- Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Sewak Manjhi, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 26/11/2025 1. The issue raised in this Writ Petition (S) is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Abha Namdeo and another vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in WP(S) No.11009 of 2025 decided on 24-11-2025. 2. In view of the above, the present writ petition is liable to be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.27 11:53:18 +0530