[2025:RJ-JP:49154] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18682/2025 Ram Babu S/o Dwarka Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Dhakad Mohalla, Vpo Haripura, Tehsil Ramganjmandi District Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Managing Director, The Pali Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Veer Durgadas Nagar, College Road, Pali, Rajasthan. 4. The Rajasthan Cooperative Recruitment Board, 10-B, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur Through Its Member Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Singh Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Gupta for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post Banking Assistant under OBC category as the petitioner secured more marks than the last cut off under OBC Category and posts are lying vacant. ii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to consider the petitioner for appointment on the post of Banking [2025:RJ-JP:49154] (2 of 3) [CW-18682/2025] Assistnat because third party right has not been accured. iii. The respondents may kindly be directed to give same benefit to the petitioner as has been given in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP NO. 1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024 (Supra). iv. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. v. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, issue notice to the respondents. 3. Additional service upon standing counsel is also permitted. 4. Mr. Rahul Gupta for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG in the cause list as counsel for the respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 02.02.2024 in case of Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, submits that the respondents are duty bound to consider the sports certificate of the petitioner in accordance with prevalent policy but same was not considered. He submits that in case, the petitioner is not found suitable in the Outstanding Sportsman category, then the petitioner is eligible to be considered for OBC (NCL) category. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the petitioner may submit a representation and same shall be considered by the Department. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the [2025:RJ-JP:49154] (3 of 3) [CW-18682/2025] respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/249