IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36306 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Tinku Prasad @ Tinku Kumar S/O Ramnath Prasad @ Ramlal Sah R/O Vill.- Mahto Mushehri, P.s.- Chapra Mufassil, Dist.- Saran. 2. Suraj Ram S/O Late Birendra Ram R/O Vill.- Saraibaks, P.s.- Bheldi, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mili Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Chapraa Town P.S. Case No. 199 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 334(1), 303(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per prosecution case, unknown thieves have committed theft of inverter, battery and nine laptops from the Coaching Center (Vision Classes) of the Informant Sibu Singh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence as alleged against them and have falsely been implicated in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36306 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/3 present case. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. as the same has been instituted against the unknown. He further submits that on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused Babar Khan, the police made raid at the house of the petitioner no.2 Suraj Ram and recovered 02 laptops from there. Thereafter, the police raided the house of petitioner no.1 and also recovered two laptops and one battery from there. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioners had purchased the recovered article from the co-accused Babar Khan at low price and they had no knowledge that the seized articles were stolen. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and are languishing in judicial custody since 22.04.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners, stating that the offence alleged against the petitioners is serious in nature. He further submits that stolen laptops and a battery were recovered from the house of the petitioners and the petitioners have also confessed their guilt of purchasing the stolen articles from the co-accused Babar Khan. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36306 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 3/3 the period of custody of the petitioners and the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chapraa Town P.S. Case No. 199 of 2025. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T