Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.21167 of 2025
Narayan Chandra Samal …. Petitioner
Represented by Adv.- Mr. S.K. Pal, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
Represented by Adv.- Mr. P.K. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
ORDER 04.08.2025
1. Petitioner is grieving before the Writ Court against his non- selection and appointment to the post in question, although the selection of non-eligible candidates having been made, appointment is said to have been issued.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of the Court to representation dated 09.07.2025, a copy whereof avails at Annexure-5, wherein he has aired the grievance. He submits that if this representation meets consideration, his client would be satisfied.
3. Notice to opposite party nos.4 & 5 is dispensed with, since no effective order affecting anyone is being passed and the order being passed is innocuous.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ASC, this Court is of the considered opinion that the subject representation needs to be treated by opposite party nos.3 & 4, to whom notice is
Order No.
01. p. 2 dispensed with, on receipt of a web copy of this order. All contentions are kept open and it hardly needs to be stated that the stakeholders shall be given an opportunity of hearing.
Ordered accordingly and the writ petition is disposed of fixing time for compliance as eight weeks.
It is open to the answering opposite parties to solicit any information or documents from the side of the petitioner, as required for taking a decision on the subject representation. However, in that guise delay shall not be brooked.
Now, no costs.
Registry to send a copy of this order by Speed Post immediately to opposite party nos.3 & 4 for consideration and needful action.
( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge Anisha Designation: Junior Stenographer